|
Letters to
the Editor - July 2007
Pound for Poundbury
I visit Poundbury many times a year (Robin Page,
March). The original scheme was a village in appearance except for
a French chateau, which was out of keeping to my mind. The rest is
a good mix of commercial properties and the essential pub. Alas, it
started to grow, swallowing up two farms and spreading its tentacles
to the bypass – and is still going on. The style of housing has
changed to three or four storey buildings of pseudo Georgian-Victorian,
so a totally different concept to the original appearance – but
again a good mix of commercial development to give employment.
The question is, do people in these new developments
work here or do local workers drive in from elsewhere while the properties
are pieds-a-terre or holiday lets giving people a chance to don green
wellies? They have built a new medical centre to replace two existing
in-town practices – no doubt an improved facility but this means
more car journeys and no cycle lanes, which would have been a good
health option.
In spite of my comments I still like the concept
and could live there if I could afford to. My main objection is the
vast amount of greenfield prime farming land that’s been covered
over and the enormous profit made through conveyancing, building houses
on farmland and selling them at today’s inflated prices.
Colin Payne, Shoreham-by-Sea
Barm cake bureaucrats
I get fed up with barmy bureaucrats, the latest being
the ones who stopped a baker calling her novelty tarts, pig tarts,
as they don’t contain pigs or pork. I guess that puts an end
to cottage or shepherd’s pie, Swiss rolls, Welsh rarebit, Irish
stew etc. I don’t remember finding any fingers in my grandmother’s
Deadman’s fingers cake, though her rock cakes could indeed have
been made with rocks. Maybe those bureaucrats are as barmy as barm
cakes.
Ron Bird, Leighton Buzzard
Prepared to back RSPB
I too am disturbed when I see a sparrowhawk catch
one of ‘my’ garden birds but firmly believe they are not
responsible for the decline of our songbirds. Comparing pre-war countryside
to the environment today is using a very unlevel playing field. Raptors
were indeed ‘strictly controlled’ by people who felt anything
with a hooked beak should be shot or poisoned – some directly,
most indirectly by the chemicals used on our land. Thank goodness,
today’s views are more enlightened.
‘Cats took their toll’ we are informed.
Surely, in line with the huge increase in human population since the
war, our feline friend numbers would have also increased pro rata and
thus their effect on songbird populations which makes sparrowhawk attacks
pale into insignificance.
There are a host of reasons why our songbirds are
declining – declining nest sites being one. Hedgerows, for example,
have taken a beating over many decades and even I, a supporter, have
not helped the local sparrows by having nice new white plastic fascias
installed on my house.
To blame just one aspect, the sparrowhawk, just because
it’s more obvious that other factors, I fear is well wide of
the mark and to change allegiance away from the RSPB, who champion
all birds to a group calling for culling of a species, is a great shame.
I celebrate that we have birds as magnificent as sparrowhawks and am
prepared to back the RSPB’s scientific-based view that the overall
number of our songbirds is not depleted by raptors rather than my own,
perhaps, misguided sentiments.
As for ‘the RSPB is becoming selective on what
is allowed to live on its nature reserves’. Surely it is wise
to discourage species that are not threatened in order to help those
that are, especially in declining and rarer habitats. A reserve that
doesn’t control its prime assets is surely not a reserve – it
is open countryside.
John Trew, by email
Food for thought on intervention
There comes a time when man must intervene to protect
bird species and it is now when sparrowhawks are having a detrimental
effect on our songbirds. If people didn’t feed birds then the
culprits taking them probably wouldn’t be known. The bird food
industry in Britain is worth £100 million pounds and this industry
would fold if people stopped feeding birds and birds had to rely on
finding food in the environment. The business would also collapse if
predators wiped out birds relying on seed for survival. The BTO and
RSPB rely on people feeding birds in their gardens for their surveys.
H Woolridge, Rock, Worcestershire
We’re only fattening up the
prey
In our area of Aviemore, my wife and I delight in
feeding wild birds in our garden and had masses of visitors until sparrowhawks
put in an unwelcome appearance. Now we have no more sparrows, siskins
or tits, very few finches, only two blackbirds and even the collared
doves are no longer to be seen. It’s totally useless for the
RSPB to ask for wild birds to be fed. What for? As food for these raptors?
Until the RSPB stops its supports for these hawks, wild birds and especially
sparrows will decline further in numbers.
C W Boardman, Aviemore, Inverness-shire
Does anyone recall Bill Power?
I have lived in New Zealand for thirty-three years
but still miss England and have fond memories of breeding finches and
of long walks in local woods in Kent looking for these birds. I have
only recently discovered Countryman, having purchased a used winter
1975/6 copy in an old secondhand bookstore. A great magazine. One that
shows us that those old values are still alive in this modern world
and one that makes me homesick for the old country but fills me with
nostalgia.
Anyway the purpose of my inquiry is that a few years
ago now I saw a programme on TV called Bill Power, featuring finches.
I have always wanted to see if anyone has a copy or perhaps your readers
know of where I can obtain one. I am more than happy to meet costs.
David Bellchambers, Auckland
An undisturbed appetite
We were having some decking put into the garden.
The work was almost complete and preparations were being made to fill
in the gap between the deck and the ground. At this point a mouse appeared
from under the deck. Did he have a premonition? I decided to catch
him and take him to the woods close by and the final touch could be
put to the construction of the deck. The mouse, meanwhile, sat unconcernedly
eating the peanuts which had fallen off the nearby bird table. He then
moved into the plants in the adjacent rockery but I managed to pick
him up (he didn’t resist!) and he sat on my hand quite undisturbed.
I then placed him in a clear plastic box (with airholes!), added some
peanuts and put the lid on the box where he continued to eat the nuts
with a completely relaxed air.
Eventually we took him to the woods and during the
journey he happily continued to eat the nuts. On arrival at the woods
we tipped him (her?) and the remaining nuts out of the box onto the
grass where he continued to eat his fill sitting only inches from me.
It made my day and I hope his also!
Mary Morrison, Hexham
More nonsense
Replies to my query (March) about the words my mother
sang confirmed it was a song called Koymenayo, arranged by Aubrey Kennet
and published in Francis and Day’s Popular and Community Songbook
No 2. I have another mystery to solve, a nonsense poem or song that
my father and his family from Swindon used to recite:
For he was a man who knew about etemology, hebrew,
shebrew, ju ju ology
Tintacks, shintacks, hobnailed boot jacks
He was as full as a Pickford’s van
Those who cracked up
Edison
Swore his jaw was more than medicine
Simply because he was a darn larned scientific man.
Perhaps someone can enlighten me.
Wendy MacLeod-Gilford by email
4x4 tax
Gordon Brown doesn’t need to ‘get out
more’ to know that probably ninety per cent of all 4x4s are fashion
accessories used mainly for the school run and already blocking congested
roads. That doesn’t bother him as he sees them for what they
are – a nice little earner in taxes. I’d be interested
to hear Robin Page’s views on the proposal to levy council tax
on all farm buildings.
R D Palmer, Dover, Kent
We welcome readers' letters,
which should be sent to:
Countryman, The Water Mill, Broughton Hall, Skipton,
North Yorkshire BD23 3AG
Or email: editorial@thecountryman.co.uk
The editor reserves the
right to edit letters for length and clarity. |
|
|
|
|